grams., geographical part, dimension out of MA, aspect from math efficiency, sex, degree level, and you will book 12 months), i held brand new heterogeneity shot. The fresh new Q take to (heterogeneity sample) discovered the differences among perception models, therefore to explore which potential moderator (we.age., investigation possess) have starred a job throughout these distinctions is actually expected.
Geographical Part
Geographical countries was in fact believed a potential average basis. The outcome products was basically categorized into the four broad organizations: Us, Europe, Asia or other areas. New analytical heterogeneity among impression versions are revealed (Q = , p = 0.01). Especially, the studies having Far eastern examples met with the biggest feeling dimensions (r = ?0.41), because education having European examples displayed the smallest perception size (roentgen = ?0.21). On top of that, the studies with our team examples had a larger impact proportions (r = ?0.30) compared to relevant category for the European countries, as they got an inferior effect proportions compared to the involved category in the Asia.
Intercourse
The moderate analyses with the gender was basically conducted due to a couple methods. Earliest, the course with this varying are consistent with Ma’s (1999) investigation, and in addition we opposed whether the mathematics nervousness-overall performance hook is notably some other among about three kinds (male, lady, and you can combined); the outcomes ideal there have been zero differences one of several around three classes (Q = cuatro.62, p = 0.099). Next, this study had a tendency to offer next to evaluate when you should ban the mistake impression regarding the blended class and you can whether or not the average correlations anywhere between male and female was indeed rather some other. Just eight degree you to given new correlation between MA and you may mathematics show or vital information could well be transferred to effect versions having some other sexes was basically provided. The outcome suggested zero significant difference anywhere between girls (roentgen = ?0.30) and you can males (roentgen = ?0.18) (Q = 2.73, p = 0.098).
Degree Height
Four amounts-level teams was indeed shaped within meta-study, together with a fundamental class, junior large class, elderly high group, blend class, and university classification. The outcome suggested it adjustable got extreme outcomes into the math anxiety-overall performance hook up (Q = , p = 0.02). A great deal more particularly, the elderly large category encountered the biggest math nervousness-overall performance hook (r = ?0.44), with the junior large class (r = ?0.39), university (r = ?0.33), basic (roentgen = ?0.27) chatib ban kaldırma, and you may mixed class, which in fact had the tiniest math nervousness-abilities hook (r = ?0.21).
Book Age
The modern meta-studies consisted of enough time physique from 19 age (2000–2018). To check on if day had an effect on the math stress-efficiency link, a good Pearson correlation is presented within book age therefore the of the many individual education (r = 0.27, p > 0.05). No correlation was discovered between impression products and the book ages (Profile 4).
Measurement away from MA
We also browsed if the bills used to test mathematics stress got an effect on the brand new mathematics nervousness-abilities link. The outcomes advised that the dimension out-of MA had no feeling for the mathematics stress-abilities link (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, private studies that used almost every other balances (elizabeth.g., the brand new Math Nervousness Scale to possess Elementary College Pupils [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] encountered the biggest math anxiety-results connect (r = ?0.41), with studies that used the fresh new MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (roentgen = ?0.35), MAQ (roentgen = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (r = ?0.24), SEMA (r = ?0.24), and AMAS (r = ?0.24), and you can personal education which used the brand new MASC had the smallest math anxiety-overall performance hook (roentgen = ?0.15).
Dimensions out of Math Abilities
The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).